Standar Pengelolaan Penilaian Peserta Didik di Madarasah Aliyah Ma’arif Balong

Authors

  • Fery Diantoro Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ponorogo, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0918-3013
  • Amalia Fitri Ristyana Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ponorogo, Indonesia
  • Eka Aprilia Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ponorogo, Indonesia
  • Fahira Alhamdila Anshori Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ponorogo, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21154/sajiem.v5i1.298

Keywords:

assessment standards, student assessment, assessment management

Abstract

Assessment is an activity or process of collecting and processing information so that student learning outcomes can be measured and reviewed. Management of student assessment has standards that must be met by teachers or educators so that the assessment results are objective to measure the level of development and achievement of learning. MA Ma'arif Balong applies standards for managing student assessment with an assessment model that is expected to improve the quality and quality of education. This study was conducted using a descriptive qualitative method, because this study was conducted directly and requires real objects to search for, find and select new knowledge based on several structured theories and principles that are carried out seriously. The purpose of this study is to describe the management model, techniques and factors that influence the assessment. Management of assessment at MA Ma'arif Balong is carried out according to educational assessment standards that are sourced from government regulations on student assessment which are developed and adjusted to the needs of the madrasah. The student assessment model at MA Ma'arif Balong uses authentic assessment, daily test assessment, mid-semester assessment, and final semester assessment. The student assessment technique uses attitude assessment, knowledge assessment and skills assessment. The management of student assessment at MA Ma'arif Balong is influenced by two factors, namely factors from within the test which include test directions or instructions, choice of words on the test instrument, level of test difficulty, inappropriate time and number of questions, and factors from students which consist of the level of student motivation and differences in learning and understanding test.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Faujah, Helmalia, Rizka Dwi Mulyani, Rizki Ananda, dan Ramdhan Witarsa. “Analisis Standar Penilaian Pendidikan Dasar?: Studi Literatur Review.” Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia 7, no. 3 (2022): 90–94.

Fitriyah, Syahadatul, Arfilia Wijayanti, dan Monica Ratih Purwaningrum. “Pelaksanaan Self Assessment Peserta Didik pada Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Sekolah Dasar.” Jurnal Inovasi, Evaluasi dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran (JIEPP) 4, no. 1 (2024): 121–27. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiepp.v4i1.377.

Heryanto. “Model Penilaian Hasil Belajar Dan Karakter.” Jurnal Edueksos 6, no. 2 (2017): 199–216. https://doi.org/10.35568/naturalistic.v2i2.194.

Irzan, Putri Alia Miranti, Heldo Pratama, Lestari Elviana, Rizki Ananda, dan Nasrul. “Analisis Standar Penilaian Pendidikan Dasar.” Pendas?: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar 09, no. 02 (2024): 7823–30.

Karimulah, Achmad, dan Nur Ittihadatul Ummah. “Pelaksanaan Supervisi Akademik Kepala Madrasah Sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Profesionalisme Guru Untuk Memotivasi Belajar Siswa MTs Muqoddimatul Akhlak Curah Wungkal Silo Jember.” Southeast Asian Journal of Islamic Education Management 3, no. 1 (2021): 13–34. https://doi.org/10.21154/sajiem.v3i1.74.

Kementrian Agama. Pedoman Penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Tingkat Madrasah Aliyah (MA). Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Islam, 2014.

Kementrian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan. Model Penilaian Pencapaian Kompetensi Peserta Didik Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Pertama, 2013.

Kusainun, Noven. “Analisis Standar Penilaian Pendidikan di Indonesia.” J urnal Pendidikan 5, no. 1 (2020): 1–7.

Magdalena, Ina, Suci Arwindi, dan Saka Nayla Hasan. “Menyusun Alat Penilaian Hasil Belajar.” Sindoro Cendekia Pendidikan 2, no. 4 (2023): 10–20. https://doi.org/10.9644/scp.v1i1.332.

Mahmud, Marzuki. Manajemen Mutu Perguruan Tinggi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2012.

Majid, Abdul. Penilaian Autentik Proses Dan Hasil Belajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2014.

Moleong, Lexy J. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2007.

Mustopa, Ahmad, Hasan Basri, dan Ujang Cepi Barlian. “Analisis Standar Penilaian Pendidikan.” Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan 09, no. 01 (2021): 24–29.

Ningsih, Ika Firma, Dian Primasari, Arita Marini, dan Mohamad Syarif Sumantri. “Analisis Kebijakan Dan Pengelolaan Pendidikan Terkait Standar Penilaian Di Sekolah Dasar.” Jurnal Basicedu 5, no. 3 (2021): 1479–91.

Shofyan, Muhammad. “Model Penilaian Pendidikan Agama Islam.” Dalam Proceeding International Seminar on Islamic Education and Peace, 342–45, 2021.

Sudrajat, Imam, dan Zuhdan Kun Prasetyo. “Bagaimana model penilaian autentik berbasis proyek yang dikembangkan dalam mencapai kompetensi fisika peserta didik SMK? Imam.” Measurement in Educational Research 1, no. 2 (2021): 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258300400305.

Sukardi, M. Evaluasi Pendidikan Prinsip Dan Operasionalnya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2015.

Susanti, Sani, Desy Natalia Manurung, dan Lio Je Cio Ginting. “Kualifikasi Penentuan Kelulusan dan Analisis Penilaian Pendidikan Melalui Kemampuan Peserta Didik.” Semantik: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Budaya 2, no. 3 (2024): 43–50.

Wahyudinata, Yusuf Ramdhan. “Dampak Manajemen Pembelajaran Terhadap Hasil Penilaian Peserta Didik.” Jurnal Tahsinia 5, no. 1 (2024): 79–92.

Zahro, Aminatul. Total Quality Manajement Teori & Praktik Manajemen Untuk Mendongkrak Mutu Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media, 2014.

Published

2024-08-11

How to Cite

Diantoro, F. ., Ristyana, A. F. ., Aprilia, E. ., & Anshori, F. A. . (2024). Standar Pengelolaan Penilaian Peserta Didik di Madarasah Aliyah Ma’arif Balong. Southeast Asian Journal of Islamic Education Management, 5(1), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.21154/sajiem.v5i1.298

STATS

Abstract viewed = 45 times

Copyright and License

Copyright (c) 2024 Fery Diantoro, Amalia Fitri Ristyana, Eka Aprilia, Fahira Alhamdila Anshori

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.